abuse due to NIMDA attacks

[Francis J. Lacoste]

On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 09:19:51AM +0200, Egon Willighagen wrote:
 Another good point. I was already thinking about having a variant on
> this report:
> 
> requested pages, top X (minus robots)
> 
> but this should also be used:
> 
> requested pages, top X (minus attacks)
> 
> Maybe this should be integrated in one report...
> Francis, would that be possible (october release)... to have a filter
> activated depending on some variable?

No, and I don't think it is really a lacking possibility. I think there
should be two different reports for this. It's more clear; the description
and title can also be tweaked appropriately foreach. 
The users can better know the purpose of the reports. 

-- 
Francis J. Lacoste
francis at Contre.COM
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.logreport.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20010924/0ccaf17f/attachment.bin