abuse due to NIMDA attacks

[Egon Willighagen]

On Monday 24 September 2001 16:36, Francis J. Lacoste wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 09:19:51AM +0200, Egon Willighagen wrote:
>  Another good point. I was already thinking about having a variant on
>
> > this report:
> >
> > requested pages, top X (minus robots)
> >
> > but this should also be used:
> >
> > requested pages, top X (minus attacks)
> >
> > Maybe this should be integrated in one report...
> > Francis, would that be possible (october release)... to have a filter
> > activated depending on some variable?
>
> No, and I don't think it is really a lacking possibility. I think there
> should be two different reports for this. It's more clear; the description
> and title can also be tweaked appropriately foreach.
> The users can better know the purpose of the reports.

Ok, but it is four reports...

RP, top X
RP, top X (minus attacks)
RP, top X (minus robots)
RP, top X (minus attacks, minus robots)

And eight if we have another possible option...

Egon

-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to development-request at logreport.org with a subject of
"unsubscribe". Trouble? Send an email with subject "help" to
development-request at logreport.org