bbug in bind9 report

[Francis J. Lacoste]

Joost fixed the bug in CVS and I updated the responder.

Thanks Wytze for reporting this.


Thanks for your interest in LogReport, kind Regards,

Francis J. Lacoste

-- 
Francis J. Lacoste              . .           http://www.logreport.org
/^LogReport$/               . .               flacoste at logreport.org

On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 10:35:02AM +0100, Wytze van der Raay wrote:
> Upgrading the bind9 responder at logreport.org has revealed a bug in
> the new "unstable" code release -- suddenly the bind9 report (text)
> is over 2 MB long ...
> This appears to have been caused by confusion of field names.
> Look at this:
> 
> >   Number of Lookups by Names, Top 10
> >
> >    PTR ................................................... 19964
> >    A ...................................................... 5572
> >    ANY ..................................................... 337
> >    MX ...................................................... 316
> >    AAAA ..................................................... 60
> >    TXT ....................................................... 4
> >
> >   Number of Lookups by Names by recurs, Top 10
> >
> >    PTR ................................................... 19829
> >    A ...................................................... 5572
> >    ANY ..................................................... 337
> >    MX ...................................................... 316
> >    AAAA ..................................................... 60
> >    TXT ....................................................... 4
> >
> 
> These are not "names", but "request types".
> 
> And look at this:
> 
> 
> >   Distribution of Request Types
> >
> >    bell.nlnet.nl ........................................... 971
> >    ns.bebop.nlnet.nl ....................................... 766
> >    www.bebop.nlnet.nl ...................................... 473
> >    navarro.bebop.nlnet.nl .................................. 406
> >    hubbard.bebop.nlnet.nl .................................. 243
> >    ..........
> >
> 
> These are not "request types", but "names" (and since there are so
> many distinct names, the report goes on and on and on, not restricted
> by a Top 10 clause).
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.logreport.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20011122/f0bfca9c/attachment.bin