writing report specifications: field name=? (was: Re: Field definition)

[Francis J. Lacoste]

On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 01:44:43PM +0100, gross, cedric wrote:
[...]
> In fact I'm trying to specify a report like:
> User1
> 	12-01-2002........150k
> 	13-01-2002.........64k
> User2
> 	12-01-2002........256k
> 	14-01-2002........10k

Unfortunately, that report isn't currently possible. You can't nest
a lire:timegroup in a lire:group element.

You could have

12-01-2002
	User1.............150k
	User2.............256k
13-01-2002
	User1.............64k
14-01-2002
	User2.............10k

by putting the group operation in the timegroup one.

Perhaps this should be considered a bug and we should allows 
timegroup at other places than the top-level operation.

-- 
Francis J. Lacoste
francis at Contre.COM
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.logreport.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20020130/040462c1/attachment.bin