writing report specifications: field name=? (was: Re: Field definition)

[Francis J. Lacoste]

On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 04:56:14PM +0100, gross, cedric wrote:
> > Perhaps this should be considered a bug and we should allows 
> > timegroup at other places than the top-level operation.
> 
> From my administrator's point of view, is better to monitoring an user
> activity with all dates for this user than checking all date to see if a
> given user have done something.
> 
> If you are able to change that, it will be absolutely fantastic.

Indeed, it is a very valid perspective. I'll put this on our TODO list.
We'll keep you informed of progress.

Thanks for your interest in LogReport, kind Regards,

Francis J. Lacoste

-- 
Francis J. Lacoste              . .           http://www.logreport.org
/^LogReport$/               . .               flacoste at logreport.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.logreport.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20020130/4f0e3f5f/attachment.bin