writing report specifications: field name=? (was: Re: Field definition)

[gross, cedric]

Hello Francis,

> Envoyé : dimanche 17 mars 2002 00:33
> À : gross, cedric; LogReport Development List (E-mail)
> Objet : Re: writing report specifications: field name=? (was: 
> Re: Field
> definition)
> 
> 
> Hi Cédric!
> 
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 12:10:13PM -0500, Francis J. Lacoste wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 04:56:14PM +0100, gross, cedric wrote:
> > > > Perhaps this should be considered a bug and we should allows 
> > > > timegroup at other places than the top-level operation.
> > > 
> > > From my administrator's point of view, is better to 
> monitoring an user
> > > activity with all dates for this user than checking all 
> date to see if a
> > > given user have done something.
> > > 
> > > If you are able to change that, it will be absolutely fantastic.
> > 
> > Indeed, it is a very valid perspective. I'll put this on 
> our TODO list.
> > We'll keep you informed of progress.
> > 
> 
> It is now implemented. Timegroup, rangegroup and timeslot elements can
> now be nested in group or other elements. This was commited in the CVS
> today. 
> 

Great, Wonderful, fantastic, euh, I haven't enought words ...


> I've also added a bytes-by-period-by-user FTP report like you asked.

Many thanks.
> 
> -- 
> Francis J. Lacoste
> francis at Contre.COM
> 

-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to development-request at logreport.org with a subject of
"unsubscribe". Trouble? Send an email with subject "help" to
development-request at logreport.org