PROPOSAL: Dropping LogML support

[Joost van Baal]

On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 05:06:41PM -0400, Francis J. Lacoste wrote:
> 
> Anyone objects to dropping LogML output support and wants to step 
> forward to maintain it?

> Also, the last NEWS on the LogML web page
> (http://www.cs.rpi.edu/projects/pb/WWWPal/news.html) is 
> 
> "06/29/2001 LOGML 1.0 Draft Specification Updated  - New LOGML Schema"
> 
> So, no new development on LogML since a year.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/w3pal/message/7 is from Fri Aug 16, 2002
5:57 pm.  (groups.yahoo.com is only accessible when allowing cookies.)
The message was more related to W3Pal than to LOGML, though...

On 2002/08/19 05:32:52 the W3Pal Quick Tutorial (
http://www.cs.rpi.edu/projects/pb/WWWPal/w3pal_tutorial/index.html ) was
updated.

A well, we'll see...

Bye,

Joost

-- 
Joost van Baal              . .           http://www.logreport.org/
                           .   .
/^LogReport$/               . .               joostvb at logreport.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.logreport.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20021008/12e7abf3/attachment.bin